Home > TSE Commentator > Perspectives on Current Debate

Perspectives on Current Debate

July / August 2009

Current Polls

Would it be a bad idea if the Olympic Games and the FIFA World Cup were hosted in the same country only two years apart?

No

75%



Yes

25%



Comments: (12)

  • ..

    posted by Renata VG on 2009-09-30 16:07:43
    It is a lack of kwoledge to even think that Brasil, which is a country and a big one, hosting 2014 World Cup in twelve different cities and the city of Rio de Janeiro hosting the Olympic Games in 2016 would be a problem !!! Maybe in a small country such as Spain or England it would be, maybe ... but in Brazil ? While we have some people under snow we have many others going to the beach ... at the same day ... Is it the same marketing for all of them ?? Come on ...

  • ..

    posted by anonymous on 2009-09-12 10:04:42
    Though this may be of concern in a small half-island country like England, Brazil is large enough to accomodate both events easily. There is no lack of attention or space. While the 2014 WC will electrify the hearts of Brazilian people nation-wide, Rio's ~10M inhabitants will always be working with the federal government and private companies to set up the best Olympiads ever in 2016. I don't see the problem here.

  • ..

    posted by Rodrigo Frasson on 2009-09-11 03:13:40
    Rio de Janeiro is an incredible city. The South America, Brazil and the Rio deserve. The hour is arriving!

  • ..

    posted by Lucas Freitas de Ouro Preto on 2009-09-06 21:26:01
    I belive in Rio's candidature! Rio 2016, "live your passion"!

  • ..

    posted by Vinicius Vanzan on 2009-09-04 21:43:44
    Even this poll presenting clear tendency against brazilian olympic bid, the results are showing that Rio is becoming the favorite city to host 2016 games.

  • ..

    posted by M. S. Edwards on 2009-09-02 11:27:18
    I agree that hosting the two events has been done before, but the two examples mentioned cannot be compared to today's situation. '68 was a different era for the Games and for a big power like the US, hosting the two events two years apart in the 90s was a "piece of cake". It can't be denied that Rio is running a good bid for 2016, but at the same time it is difficult to imagine that in Brazil the quality of the organisation of the Games would not be damaged by the World Cup two years earlier. First, because of the huge passion the Brazilians have for football (which would harm the possibility for the Games to use the 7 year build-up time that can be used so effectively not only to organise but to create a positive "buzz"). It is also wrong to say that the World Cup can be a great "warm up" for the Games: organising football matches only in 12 stadiums is nothing compared to what it takes to organise such a big multi sport event as the Games.

  • ..

    posted by M. A. Westin on 2009-09-01 18:04:13
    I hope this doesn't come as any spoiler alert for the readers of this website, but how convenient to have this issue risen a month before the IOC votes the host city - in a context in which the two previous front runners, namely Tokyo and Chicago, are now suffering the effects of the international crisis and an European bid immediately after the 2012 London Games. Honestly, wouldn't it have been easier if the question for the poll was "Do you think Rio or any other South American country should be given the opportunity to host the World Cup and the Olympics?". Never had this issue seemed to be a problem, neither are the examples rare - Mexico 1968-1970, USA 1994-1996 - so why just now?
    Honestly, for a consulting business, you people should seriously revise your "subliminal messages" skills.

  • ..

    posted by RP on 2009-09-01 14:35:22
    I would love to know what Lord Sebastian Coe would think if the World Cup was in England next year and not in South Africa! I think that he might be tearing his hair out. How on earth could he get the British government or British companies to support his massive Olympic Games budget when they were already committed to put on a World Cup with group matches in London and the final at Wembley stadium? I can't see the IOC wanting to play second fiddle to Mr Blatter and trying to focus the attention of the whole country on an Olympic Games just two years after a World Cup would not exactly be a great way to generate support for the Olympic Movement.

  • ..

    posted by Tom Jaspar on 2009-08-28 16:03:20
    It does not make sense to give the two biggest sports event of the world to the same country. Big events need space and should not be clustered - I agree with the TSE Consulting opinion

  • ..

    posted by JP on 2009-08-28 15:38:11
    I'm not sure why these two successful brands would create competition for themselves like that??

  • ..

    posted by Andrew Young on 2009-08-28 14:41:04
    Knowing the investment necessary for such an organization as the Olympics or the football Euro, I just can't imagine that 2 such major events would be acceptable to the local population ! Furthermore, the financial investment would be enormous, and last but not least, separating enables 2 differents cities or countries in the world to get some promotion - and not all for the same one !

  • ..

    posted by Roberto Gesta de Melo on 2009-08-28 13:58:51
    The organization of the FIFA World Cup and the Olympic Games in Brazil only two years apart cannot be considered a good idea only by someone who does not know how Brazilian authorities and people are prepared, after the success of the Pan-American Games in Rio,to stage both events in 2014 and 2016 respectively, in a splendour way. The main venues for the OLympic Games will be already constructed and other infrastructure obligations to prepare Rio for the Soccer World Cup will be antecipated for the Olympics two years in advance. Or, most probably, the growing support to Rio's candidature is bothering the other candidate cities.

Name:


Comment: